|
|
Post by brett on Dec 8, 2005 10:49:39 GMT 10
I think England shoould be seeded, but France were 32nd at 2002 (OK not neccesarily but I like the sound of it) and did poorly in European qualifying and have been slipping down the rankings, why the hell are they seeded above Holland??? A little thing called 1998... |
|
|
|
Post by omni on Dec 8, 2005 10:53:17 GMT 10
1 year at home should not be enough - that weighs less then a 2002 performance and Holland have been up there for ages. Oh well they'll have to actually do something this year if they want seeding for 2010 as 1998 won't count.
|
|
|
|
Post by pieman on Dec 8, 2005 20:13:28 GMT 10
Playing at home has a huge bearing on the game. S.korea france etc. you just have to look at the olympic's and see how well the home team has done.
I know I'm scot's but Engerland is SO over rated and generally by the press in engerland! then whan they fall to pieces they hammer them!!
|
|
|
|
Post by DJ on Dec 9, 2005 11:04:22 GMT 10
The English press hammer the national team whenever they can, even if they win but play poorly!
Their players are good but can never find the right manager!
|
|
