|
|
Post by Keith Saffron on Mar 12, 2006 21:18:15 GMT 10
After Boucher calling us chokers, then Warney telling them the same, we are currently 2-333 after 43 overs. Possibly looking at the highest ODI score of all time (after Sri Lanka's 397 I think)
Bloody SA, they talk the talk, but they're all Cullinan when it comes to walking the walk
|
|
|
|
Post by Farthing on Mar 12, 2006 21:22:32 GMT 10
400 is defiently looking like happening after this batting perfomance, it will be interesting to see if we could get there.
I thought they were gone after they lost the first 2 matches but they showed everyone why they are the best side in the world and they are really playing good when it counts and it is now 2/352 after 44 overs
|
|
|
|
Post by Keith Saffron on Mar 12, 2006 21:25:35 GMT 10
Hussey and Ponting are going crazy!! This is great fun to watch! And if we lose a wicket, Symonds is in.....
|
|
|
|
Post by Keith Saffron on Mar 12, 2006 21:30:59 GMT 10
I'll be dissappointed if we don't get 400. 26 off 4 overs in this form, would be a shame not to get there
|
|
|
|
Post by Farthing on Mar 12, 2006 21:31:54 GMT 10
Hussey and Ponting are going crazy!! This is great fun to watch! And if we lose a wicket, Symonds is in..... YOu are dead right, with Symonds in next it will probally be like we never lost a wicket. The Aussies are doing all this with only losing 2 wickets it is unbelieveable |
|
|
|
Post by Farthing on Mar 12, 2006 21:41:43 GMT 10
They have got the 400 and there is still is 3 overs to go after at the start of the 47th over they bowled 4 no balls, it is like the unber 10s with this bowling from South Africa
|
|
|
|
Post by Keith Saffron on Mar 12, 2006 21:42:36 GMT 10
And there is 400, this won't be beaten for a long time, especially against a decent team (take note SL, Bangladesh do not count)
|
|
|
|
Post by Keith Saffron on Mar 12, 2006 21:44:24 GMT 10
What is the record for runs in an over? Telemachus is in all sorts. And as I tyoe this, he gets a wicket. God damn!!! (sorry Omni)
|
|
|
|
Post by Farthing on Mar 12, 2006 21:46:30 GMT 10
The record is 30 runs in an over
|
|
|
|
Post by Keith Saffron on Mar 12, 2006 21:47:24 GMT 10
AAAAARRRRGGGGHHHHH!!!! record was 30, went for 28. still, goes down in history as the man who let it go past 400 (if anyone remembers that)
|
|
|
|
Post by Fish on Mar 12, 2006 21:49:31 GMT 10
Who scored what
|
|
|
|
Post by Keith Saffron on Mar 12, 2006 21:56:21 GMT 10
Ponting 164 off 107, Gilchrist 55 off 44, Husset currently 81 off 50, Katich 79 off 90, Symonds 27 off 13, Lee 9 of 7
|
|
|
|
Post by Keith Saffron on Mar 12, 2006 21:56:57 GMT 10
final score was 4-434
|
|
|
|
Post by Fish on Mar 12, 2006 22:04:35 GMT 10
Thanks Red Pubes oh I mean Keith Saffron
|
|
|
|
Post by keensy on Mar 12, 2006 22:30:12 GMT 10
Katich...only one not to score at more then a run a ball.....we cant carry him all the time....lol
|
|
|
|
Post by omni on Mar 12, 2006 22:31:26 GMT 10
Great for a laugh those last 10 overs.
|
|
|
|
Post by Keith Saffron on Mar 12, 2006 22:47:27 GMT 10
Even funnier would be Tony Greig talking up SA's chances. I should get sick of F1 at some point.
Just flicked over to see
req. 399 off 44 overs
They have no chance, and I thought we were supposed to be choking. Well, at least to the Cullinans anyway.....
|
|
|
|
Post by Keith Saffron on Mar 13, 2006 0:05:02 GMT 10
Are they playing on tarmac?  ?? On Terry Oval? ?? This is getting ridiculous. SA are 2-200 off 23 overs. What Is going on? ?? |
|
|
|
Post by Adz on Mar 13, 2006 0:41:20 GMT 10
strange
|
|
|
|
Post by Adz on Mar 13, 2006 0:41:53 GMT 10
catches win matches
|
|
?? On Terry Oval?
