|
|
Post by omni on Mar 2, 2006 12:25:54 GMT 10
If it's another African team it should be Egypt, if not anyone but Uruguay they don't have a divine right to be there.
|
|
|
|
Post by sacko on Mar 4, 2006 21:33:23 GMT 10
If they do drop out it must be who ever came next in their group, circa Denmark in the 1992 Euros who replace the war torn Yugoslavia - and they went on to it!  |
|
|
|
Post by Pete on Mar 19, 2006 3:51:36 GMT 10
Yeah if war prevents the Ivory Coast from fielding a team, it must come from another African team. Certainly not bloody Uruguay - they LOST to us, and don't deserve a second chance.  Shame if the Ivory Coast don't compete, I was looking forward to seeing how the likes of Argentina would deal with them. Surely, most of their playing and coaching staff are either out of the country doing their thing in Europe or Asia, or should have enough resources to get out if all hell breaks loose. Could they not compete as a team in exile/ seeking refuge? |
|
|
|
Post by Yellowbeard on Mar 19, 2006 5:14:36 GMT 10
Are the mariners a country? ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by brett on Mar 20, 2006 12:27:00 GMT 10
Are the mariners a country? ;D Michael Beauchamp to Australia: "I'm sorry to inform my fellow countrymen that I must leave the Socceroo's defence to the geriatrics now that my beloved club has entered the world cup. Playing in front of the 14 travelling Marinators will mean the world to me and smashing the Aussies in the semis will be the highlight of my career." |
|
|
|
Post by Perm on Mar 30, 2006 21:59:03 GMT 10
i found out the reason for the fears that Ivory Coast couldnt make the World Cup in Germany due to transport issues.  |
|
|
|
Post by greenpoleffc on Mar 30, 2006 22:05:29 GMT 10
Oh dear, does that mean we might miss out having to watch more of Drogshites antics at the WC?
|
|
