|
|
Post by Fish on Jan 29, 2007 21:43:05 GMT 10
With the Mariners season over its time to reflect and jog your memory on what you thought was our best Goal worthy of the prestigous award that will be presented at the Clubs presentation evening. This will be an open vote so you can chose whatever goal you think you enjoyed the most. youtube.com/results?search_query=central+coast+mariners&search=SearchFor those that have forgotten a few. Simply PM me your vote and the winner will be announced on the night. ;D Entries will close on the 12th of March so there is plenty of time. Happy viewing ;D |
|
|
|
Post by DJ on Jan 29, 2007 22:10:08 GMT 10
Last year we had an easy choice, this yr not too many spectacular efforts!
Goals that spring to mind are Pondeljaks backheal vs Perth (lost me a near full schooner), again Tommy vs Adelaide round 21, SP's goal in Melbourne in the 3-3 draw, Mori's looping header vs the Jets and SP's header after Jedinaks inch perfect cross vs Adelaide!
Kwassys re-taken penalty vs QLD was a good effort too lol
|
|
marinermick
Moderator 
Coming to Bay 16 Soon
Posts: 8,657
|
Post by marinermick on Jan 30, 2007 7:33:01 GMT 10
For me it was a choice of the three Tommy goals as the three top goals of the season.
|
|
|
|
Post by DJ on Jan 30, 2007 8:31:35 GMT 10
IMO the build up play then inch perfect cross from Jedinak onto SP's head is a great all round goal, without good service and build up play it makes a strikers job bloody hard. In saying that Tommy's backheal flick and 25 yard lob was top notch!
|
|
|
|
Post by serious14 on Jan 30, 2007 11:54:22 GMT 10
i). Tom Pondeljak backheel vs. Perth, October 20th
ii). Damien Mori's first goal to make it 2-1 vs. Sydney, October 13th
iii). Tom Pondeljak's 25 yard lob vs. Adelaide, 21st January
|
|
|
|
Post by brett on Jan 30, 2007 20:30:50 GMT 10
Backheel
|
|
|
|
Post by Foriegnmariner on Jan 31, 2007 9:37:53 GMT 10
1st Gotta be Tommy P back-heel-flick-thing goal vs Perth.
|
|
|
|
Post by alicia on Jan 31, 2007 10:09:59 GMT 10
I think both goals from Tommy in that game were excellent. Not sure if I could pick which one though. www.youtube.com/watch?v=tD4vAD8lY4sFish, will you be narrowing the voting selection down after you get nominations? |
|
|
|
Post by brett on Jan 31, 2007 13:51:25 GMT 10
I believe if it's a goal, it's nominated. Vote for any goal.
|
|
|
|
Post by alicia on Jan 31, 2007 14:04:37 GMT 10
I believe if it's a goal, it's nominated. Vote for any goal. Is it then possible that a goal can win by only getting two or three votes? |
|
marinermick
Moderator
Coming to Bay 16 Soon
Posts: 8,657
|
Post by marinermick on Jan 31, 2007 14:08:00 GMT 10
I believe if it's a goal, it's nominated. Vote for any goal. Is it then possible that a goal can win by only getting two or three votes? yes, but highly unlikely you are voting for your favourite goal of the season - narrowing list only means people may vote for a goal that was not their original favourite goal |
|
|
|
Post by alicia on Jan 31, 2007 14:12:39 GMT 10
Is it then possible that a goal can win by only getting two or three votes? yes, but highly unlikely you are voting for your favourite goal of the season - narrowing list only means people may vote for a goal that was not their original favourite goal Understood. Thanks. |
|
|
|
Post by dibo (pron. "DIB-OH") on Jan 31, 2007 14:25:46 GMT 10
Is it then possible that a goal can win by only getting two or three votes? yes, but highly unlikely you are voting for your favourite goal of the season - narrowing list only means people may vote for a goal that was not their original favourite goal well what we clearly need here is an optional preferential ballot! |
|
marinermick
Moderator
Coming to Bay 16 Soon
Posts: 8,657
|
Post by marinermick on Jan 31, 2007 14:28:29 GMT 10
yes, but highly unlikely you are voting for your favourite goal of the season - narrowing list only means people may vote for a goal that was not their original favourite goal well what we clearly need here is an optional preferential ballot! screw that in my last job we had students voted on our board of management with as low as two primary votes (themselves and their girlfriend obviously) because of preferential voting |
|
kevrenor
Moderator
Keeping the 'surrounding regions' yellow since 2004 ... Be Mariners, be Yellow, be a Marinator!
Posts: 2,130
|
Post by kevrenor on Jan 31, 2007 17:42:49 GMT 10
well what we clearly need here is an optional preferential ballot! screw that in my last job we had students voted on our board of management with as low as two primary votes (themselves and their girlfriend obviously) because of preferential voting Screw that! Obviously more people preferred them. First past the post is the domain of the undemocratic ... BTW, back to topic ... how do we actually vote in this .... it is stick our choice here, ja? In that case ... Tommy's flick! |
|
|
|
Post by brett on Jan 31, 2007 19:55:59 GMT 10
You must PM your vote to Fish...as I read back and found out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fish on Jan 31, 2007 20:42:53 GMT 10
Dibo you would take a poll to see what foot to put on the floor first thing in the morning.  The idea is to get peoples opinions not just get 50 mundane voters say"Yeah I agree with them thats my favourite" Take the time to have a look and recall some you may have forgotten about. Its all about individual preference. |
|
|
|
Post by prisky on Feb 3, 2007 16:15:52 GMT 10
Here is an outsider
Nik Mrdja's free kick against NZ
|
|
|
|
Post by Grunta on Feb 4, 2007 8:04:28 GMT 10
Good one.
That was a great strike.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bearinator on Feb 5, 2007 10:55:59 GMT 10
My pick..
Jamie Macs header against Melbourne, after Mori ran his big fat ass off to stop the ball going out behind the back line, 1st times it into the middle, then Jamie with the looping header over Theo to make it 1-1. Great goal.
|
|
