|
|
Post by dibo (pron. "DIB-OH") on Nov 26, 2007 17:21:24 GMT 10
If it has anything to do with hot dogs and pollock's group, I think you'll find its a bit of a 'gee-up' and meant in fun?. They all came in a mini bus full of Gosford City boys (good on them for organising a bus too!) and probably all sat together calling themselves 'the dock' ? I'm sorta guessing at all of that so don't quote me, because if it isn't their group it would need to be looked into I guess. Me and my family went up in Fish's car (only took 15 mins from ourimbah...LOL - those who have driven with Fish will know what I mean  ) so we could call ourselves "Fish's fearless 5" if they're gosford city boys then they must be all right then eh? |
|
|
|
Post by Jeff (LouMacari) on Nov 26, 2007 17:41:04 GMT 10
hmmm...re read my post and still don't see where I inferred that because they're Gos city they're ok? Must be the way you read it! |
|
|
|
Post by Fish on Nov 26, 2007 19:46:31 GMT 10
Personally I have no dramas with it.
We have been round long enough now for people to know where we sit and what we are about.They obviously wont be sitting in Bay 16 so there wont be any link between how they behave and how we do.
Stigma about the marinators PLEASE WTF.
As we have said numerous times we dont have the sole rights to be a supporters group so the less crap about htis supposed new group thebetter after all it may well be a piss take lads
|
|
|
|
Post by Fish on Nov 26, 2007 20:11:31 GMT 10
I dont give a f*** what it said. I was just making the point if a new group wants to start let 'em.
|
|
|
|
Post by MrCelery on Nov 26, 2007 20:13:26 GMT 10
... yet apparently it is cool to smash bottles in the carpark on away games and write yourself off till you cant talk and keep falling over. Are you sure they're not a Squadrunts spin off? Sounds right up their alley. I have no problem if we have 50 supporters groups, as long as they represent the Club positively. While it would nice to be all-inclusive under the Marinators, that's not (and shouldn't be) a prerequisite for being part of the yellow army. The only downside would be if each 'group' turned on each other as the expense of directing our efforts against the opposition supporters. That's what is happening in Newcastle I believe. |
|
|
|
Post by Bearinator on Nov 26, 2007 22:20:21 GMT 10
... yet apparently it is cool to smash bottles in the carpark on away games and write yourself off till you cant talk and keep falling over. Are you sure they're not a Squadrunts spin off? Sounds right up their alley. Nope. Overheard security talking about it stright after their bus pulled up, and judging from what I saw and heard, its true. Dickheads. |
|
|
|
Post by blackadder on Nov 26, 2007 22:25:07 GMT 10
For those questioning what I meant about stigma, prehaps a better choice of word is perception. (ie perception that bay 16 is "the" bay).
What ever happens with "the dock", the most important thing IMHO is that everyone gets behind the Mariners in what ever way they see fit.
|
|
|
|
Post by greenpoleffc on Nov 27, 2007 18:06:59 GMT 10
Are these the guys in/around bay 18/19 at Bluetongue???
If so, they have never been part of Bay 16 regulars and I see a lot of them at away games and they are not trouble makers.
|
|
|
|
Post by Perm on Nov 27, 2007 19:08:26 GMT 10
Ive had a chat to someone and its not Pollock and his crew etc. its a bunch of others that are keen on being an expansion of Bay 16 into Bay 17.
More details to follow.
|
|
|
|
Post by shelleybeach on Dec 1, 2007 6:17:31 GMT 10
perhaps Richard Noone can tell shed some light on this development?
|
|
|
|
Post by Perm on Dec 1, 2007 13:59:59 GMT 10
this isnt another CSE.
|
|
|
|
Post by greenpoleffc on Dec 2, 2007 14:42:33 GMT 10
Were these the group of kids who made a brief appearance in Bay 15??
|
|
|
|
Post by Perm on Dec 3, 2007 9:40:29 GMT 10
i think theyre planning to stand in bay 17. its just a move to expand to the next bays. i was told some shite that the players were involved and this was there idea as they have mates in the bay and thought that the Dock was a good name/idea as the Mariners dont really marinate anything.
its just a matter of wait and see for the next home game as i was told that theyd be there in bay 17 against sydney.
|
|
|
|
Post by Andy on Dec 3, 2007 12:38:33 GMT 10
I reckon it's a good idea.
As long as they where yellow and sing all game, there shouldn't really be a problem.
They'd also make our Home End look bigger as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeff (LouMacari) on Dec 3, 2007 20:32:59 GMT 10
i think theyre planning to stand in bay 17. its just a move to expand to the next bays. i was told some shite that the players were involved and this was there idea as they have mates in the bay and thought that the Dock was a good name/idea as the Mariners dont really marinate anything. its just a matter of wait and see for the next home game as i was told that theyd be there in bay 17 against sydney. you really were told some shite weren't you Perm! more yellow, more noise = good ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Pete on Dec 3, 2007 23:26:21 GMT 10
i think theyre planning to stand in bay 17. its just a move to expand to the next bays. i was told some shite that the players were involved and this was there idea as they have mates in the bay and thought that the Dock was a good name/idea as the Mariners dont really marinate anything. its just a matter of wait and see for the next home game as i was told that theyd be there in bay 17 against sydney. you really were told some shite weren't you Perm! more yellow, more noise = good ;D Could these be the mates of McAndrew that you mentioned to me a few weeks back, Jeff? Oh well, whatever....  |
|
|
|
Post by Perm on Dec 4, 2007 8:00:17 GMT 10
nah theyre not.
|
|
) so we could call ourselves "Fish's fearless 5"
