|
Post by keensy on Apr 23, 2007 22:14:58 GMT 10
the two players in my 18s side are 'dual registered' and are playing both 16s and 18s
|
|
|
Post by jigsaw on Apr 24, 2007 13:45:50 GMT 10
i guess thats a permissable option too so as to make team numbers viable, 18's not being considered seniors
|
|
|
Post by offtheball on Apr 24, 2007 16:50:40 GMT 10
yeah, i guess thats a permissable option too so as to make team numbers viable, 18's not being considered seniors I don't quite get it. What is the rule? 18's are not seniors. 16's can dual register in 16's and 18's. What about 16's and 17's? 17's and 18's? 12's and 14's? etc
|
|
|
Post by thetoffeemen on Apr 24, 2007 18:04:26 GMT 10
You are dead right, nothing adds up what so ever.
Lets try again, you need to be turning 17 to play in the current season at senior level, if you are not turning 17 in that season you must play 16s, thats very clear to me so why 16s playing in 18s comp. Dual registration should not come into the equation
|
|
|
Post by informed on Apr 25, 2007 14:12:57 GMT 10
This doesn't make sense. So can the current board just make up the rules as they go along
|
|
|
Post by jigsaw on Apr 25, 2007 19:52:04 GMT 10
I am only clear on the seniors/17 year decision, means we can re-register 3 players - dont pretend to be an expert on the dual registration rules. i had assumed that if these u/16 players were in fact legitimately dual registered then it was because one played on friday night and the other a saturday. girls can dual register and play on saturday and sunday. from what i understand, ccf board has pretty much total control over rules. whether some clubs are properly registering/playing according to the rules is another matter that may or may not be detected during the season, it usually happens at semis.
|
|
Gibbsy
Local league player
Posts: 60
|
Post by Gibbsy on May 7, 2007 14:28:56 GMT 10
The Gosford 18as coach must be really worried if he relies on 3 under 16a to beat Wyoming 18as, sounds like the rest of the 18as are really crap, by the way it was the Gosford 16a coach who developed the 3 under 16as boys from age of 13 so it does not say much for the coach of the Under 18as Gosford coach. Maybe he should go take some coaching lessons. Such an un-educated response... considering 2 of the under 18's players in our team play first grade regularly and several others often play reserve grade, i highly doubt we were "relying" on the 16's to win, they are apart of our team as much as any other person. And to think that it is permitted for a coach to take control of teams in different clubs is a joke, eg wyoming 18a1's, gosford 16a's... is there not a code of ethics that prevents this anywhere? coming back to what keensy said, the coach only doesnt want the 16 yr olds to play in our 18a's team because it will benefit his wyoming 18a's side. and just for your interest, Gosford 18a's beat Wyoming 18a1's through hard work, determination and never giving up... 3 goals in 2mins is a feat to be commended.
|
|
|
Post by keensy on May 7, 2007 18:12:47 GMT 10
"it does not say much for the coach of the Under 18as Gosford coach. Maybe he should go take some coaching lessons."
So ur saying just because our coach hasnt been their coach before he is a bad coach. Former state league coach at sutherland and a youth academy coach, i think he has had enough 'coaching lessons'.
Basically i think we can disregard your post as garabge which made no sense, especially when you are commenting on something you no sweet f*** all about.
you must be a wyoming supporter???
|
|
|
Post by offtheball on May 7, 2007 21:08:33 GMT 10
The 16as have played 3 games with 10 men for the best part of each game, I watched them today v Terrigal 16as, even with 4 b graders and a under 15s goalkeeper they still look the best football side on the coast at this age level, everything played from the back, fast quality football, they are a credit to the way they have been taught to play with no fear of mistakes not the shit football every other kid his taught to play on the coast, kick and chase, I look forward to seeing great football again from these boys. Toffeeman seems to be a red supporter who is confused. This superstar team lost for the fourth time in 5 meetings V Tuggerah in round 1.
|
|
Gibbsy
Local league player
Posts: 60
|
Post by Gibbsy on May 8, 2007 15:03:56 GMT 10
yes, but u must be a wyoming supporter. all that matters is that despite any attempt by the "dual" coach as i shall refer to him as, gosford 18a's beat wyoming (both of the teams)
|
|
|
Post by keensy on May 8, 2007 15:56:43 GMT 10
The 16as have played 3 games with 10 men for the best part of each game, I watched them today v Terrigal 16as, even with 4 b graders and a under 15s goalkeeper they still look the best football side on the coast at this age level, everything played from the back, fast quality football, they are a credit to the way they have been taught to play with no fear of mistakes not the shit football every other kid his taught to play on the coast, kick and chase, I look forward to seeing great football again from these boys. Toffeeman seems to be a red supporter who is confused. This superstar team lost for the fourth time in 5 meetings V Tuggerah in round 1. They played with 7 men for one half and 9 the second and still scored 3 goals against tuggerah. Your right though, tuggerah are superstars
|
|
|
Post by offtheball on May 8, 2007 16:23:05 GMT 10
Toffeeman seems to be a red supporter who is confused. This superstar team lost for the fourth time in 5 meetings V Tuggerah in round 1. They played with 7 men for one half and 9 the second and still scored 3 goals against tuggerah. Your right though, tuggerah are superstars "You're right though, Tuggerah are superstars". I presume this is a piece of sarcasm. Doesn't make sense, Toffemen was the one declaring super stardom. Tuggerah have beaten Gosford 4 out of the last 5 times they played. Including major semi and grand final. Gosford had one victory 1 nil in round 2 last year. Every time the team loses there is a myriad of excuses. Lost the 14's grand final as well to Kanwal and it was the referees fault The story of how many players Gosford had in round 1 seems to be more exagerated as the season unfolds. Correct me if i'm wrong but you need 8 players to commence a game.
|
|
Gibbsy
Local league player
Posts: 60
|
Post by Gibbsy on May 8, 2007 16:25:49 GMT 10
ill correct you, you need 7 to play. 6 is a forfeit
|
|
|
Post by offtheball on May 8, 2007 16:36:46 GMT 10
ill correct you, you need 7 to play. 6 is a forfeit No problem! Won't be the last blue I make. Facts still the same Gosford had 8 for 20 min then 9 for the remainder of the game. You "forgot" to mention Tuggerah had 10 for the second half.
|
|
|
Post by offtheball on May 8, 2007 19:55:58 GMT 10
Just wanted to clarify one thing. Not for one second was I denigrating any of the Gosford 16A players. Lot of sensational players in that squad.
Just wanted to have a dig at Tofeemen who I think is a touch one eyed.
|
|